Abbas Abbaspour; Morteza Badri
Volume 24, Issue 79 , March 2016, , Pages 73-100
Abstract
The purpose of this study was "Relationship between psychological empowerment and Effective factors of the productivity of human resources. This study was a descriptive study that was conducted in manner correlation and the type of target, was applications And the survey was used for gathering data. ...
Read More
The purpose of this study was "Relationship between psychological empowerment and Effective factors of the productivity of human resources. This study was a descriptive study that was conducted in manner correlation and the type of target, was applications And the survey was used for gathering data. all facilities department staff of different branches of Bank Melli of Mash’had were chosen randomly as the sample. The data were collected by the Spreitzer’sstandard psychological empowerment questionnaire with a 92% reliability coefficient as well as the Goldsmith’s Effective factors of productivity of human resources standard questionnaire with a 93% reliability coefficient.The data were also analyzed by the Pearson’s correlation test, linear regression analysis, and T-test. The results show that psychological empowerment and Effective factors of productivity of human resources have a positive and significant relation (52%) and based on the findings, the psychological empowerment predicts a 30% of productivity for human resources among the staff. As can be suggested by the results, the factor impact as one of the psychological empowerment components with a β= 46% has the most meaningful effect on the Effective factors of productivity of human resources with a 5% level. The positive coefficient suggests that the higher the factor, the higher the productivity for human resources. It is recommended that organizations apply the different methods for the psychological empowerment creation and reinforcement to improve the productivity of human resources and ultimately the organizational productivity.
Abbas Abbaspour; Ahmad Aghazadeh; Amin bagheri kerachi
Volume 21, Issue 69 , January 2013, , Pages 171-217
Abstract
In this age of chaos, a small change can make a big impact. For change management in this chaotic environment, Methods and other traditional paradigm is not appropriate. Thus, the higher education system needs to forms of agility. The aim of this study is to answer the following question: What are the ...
Read More
In this age of chaos, a small change can make a big impact. For change management in this chaotic environment, Methods and other traditional paradigm is not appropriate. Thus, the higher education system needs to forms of agility. The aim of this study is to answer the following question: What are the Agility indices in the universities? .The method of the present research is grounded theory. this research defineded Agility indices as follows: agility drivers, agility capabilities ,agility providers, agility Outcomes. Therefore, The findings of this research indicates that a agile University to fulfill their responsibilities, must identify agility drivers and To deal with these drivers ,acquire this agility competencies (intelligece and masttering change ,being a solutions provider, being knowledge - driven, innovation, speed and flexibility) and enablers (organization, technology, agile people, culture, partnering).
